It is where a daughter’s plea is being made to allow her to have the freedom she wants, to be able to enjoy the nurturing home of her mother – free from interference and condemnation.
When? The balance of this Emergency Hearing is October 14th, approximately 1:30pm at the Forsyth County Courthouse in Cumming, GA.
Why is this hearing noteworthy?
It is now apparent that the Judge and the father’s attorney have some sort of special relationship. That was clear.
The father showed disdain for his daughter’s well-being and is clearly working to alienate the daughter from her mother.
The daughter is making outcries for help from the court, with more than one compelling affidavit filed showing that she is not under undo influence but very clear-minded in what is best for her at this age.
How has it been that for many years this has been such a struggle? Consider that more than two judges have cooperated in allowing “experts” to dictate a high level of stress on this girl by sending her out of state to a place called “The Rachel House” which is known for isolating and brainwashing children to believe they must accept unhealthy relationships, while being severed from their more nurturing parent.
This case was called to our attention because of the combination of the damages to this child, the involvement of Dr. Howard Drutman and his participation with Judge Bagley in ensuring that The Rachel House recommendations were followed.
This is one to watch, so join us in Forsyth County soon to hear whether this judge follows the laws that dictate that the health and well-being of children come before special relationships between professionals.
UPDATE: This article was just shared with us about this judge who ignored evidence and pleas for help from a teen girl, sent her back to live in an unsafe situation, and then the known sex offender in that residence killed her guardian and raped the teen. How many stories like this one have to be told before we step up and demand that judges protect children?
Back to Dr. Howard Drutman: why is it noteworthy that this is the “doctor” trusted by this judge? Let’s take a look. Reviews such as this one are telling:
“Doctor Drutman was unprofessional, biased, and writes his opinions in child custody to favor known proclivities of the court judges, not as an uninfluenced professional. He damages children’s lives by falsifying reports, skewing information and failing to follow established APA guidelines. His work is an embarrassment to the profession and he should be barred form child psychology evaluations.”